Spatial access disparities to primary health care in rural and remote Australia

Submitted: 20 March 2015
Accepted: 12 August 2015
Published: 4 November 2015
Abstract Views: 17267
PDF: 7612
HTML: 2259
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Poor spatial access to health care remains a key issue for rural populations worldwide. Whilst geographic information systems (GIS) have enabled the development of more sophisticated access measures, they are yet to be adopted into health policy and workforce planning. This paper provides and tests a new national-level approach to measuring primary health care (PHC) access for rural Australia, suitable for use in macro-level health policy. The new index was constructed using a modified two-step floating catchment area method framework and the smallest available geographic unit. Primary health care spatial access was operationalised using three broad components: availability of PHC (general practitioner) services; proximity of populations to PHC services; and PHC needs of the population. Data used in its measurement were specifically chosen for accuracy, reliability and ongoing availability for small areas. The resultant index reveals spatial disparities of access to PHC across rural Australia. While generally more remote areas experienced poorer access than more populated rural areas, there were numerous exceptions to this generalisation, with some rural areas close to metropolitan areas having very poor access and some increasingly remote areas having relatively good access. This new index provides a geographically-sensitive measure of access, which is readily updateable and enables a fine granulation of access disparities. Such an index can underpin national rural health programmes and policies designed to improve rural workforce recruitment and retention, and, importantly, health service planning and resource allocation decisions designed to improve equity of PHC access.

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Supporting Agencies

Project of the Australian Primary Health Care Research Institute (APHCRI), which is supported by a grant from the Australian Government Department of Health and Ageing
Matthew Richard McGrail, School of Rural Health, Monash University, Churchill; Centre of Research Excellence in Rural and Remote Primary Health Care, Bendigo, Victoria

School of Rural Health

Senior Research Fellow

John Stirling Humphreys, School of Rural Health, Monash University, Churchill; Centre of Research Excellence in Rural and Remote Primary Health Care, Bendigo, Victoria

School of Rural Health,

Emeritus Professor

How to Cite

McGrail, M. R., & Humphreys, J. S. (2015). Spatial access disparities to primary health care in rural and remote Australia. Geospatial Health, 10(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2015.358

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.