Synergistic drivers of Lyme disease emergence in North America: an eco-syndemic review
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Authors
Lyme disease is a growing public health threat driven by interplay of climatic, ecological and social factors. This review adopts an eco-syndemic framework, viewing Lyme disease emergence as the confluence of multiple synergistic drivers rather than a single- cause phenomenon. We synthesize evidence that climate conditions, ecological circumstances and human behavioural patterns inter- sect to amplify Lyme disease risk. By integrating these seemingly separate domains, our review highlights novel insights; for exam- ple, habitat fragmentation and predator loss may magnify the effects of a warming climate on reservoir or host populations, and human activities in suburban green spaces may mediate infection cycles. This holistic perspective is a departure from reductionist explanations and emphasizes the importance of coupled human–environment systems in studies of disease emergence. We discuss how an eco-syndemic frame can improve surveillance and prevention emphasizing One Health approaches that unite environmental management with animal health and public health outreach. Understanding the interactive and non-linear dynamics of Lyme disease drivers is crucial for developing effective interventions and preparing for future tick-borne disease challenges. While selected com- parative evidence from Europe is used where relevant, the review’s primary empirical focus is North America.
CRediT authorship contribution
Michael F. Ojo and Korine N. Kolivras jointly contributed to the conceptualization and overall framing of the review. Michael F. Ojo con- ducted the literature search, led the synthesis and analytical integration of findings, and prepared the original draft of the manuscript. Korine N. Kolivras provided methodological guidance, critical evaluation, and substantive revisions that refined the structure, clarity, and scholarly rigor of the review. Both authors contributed to the interpretation of the findings, participated in the revision process, and approved the final version of the manuscript.
Data Availability Statement
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
How to Cite

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
