Spatiotemporal epidemiology of COVID-19 from an epidemic course perspective

Submitted: 11 June 2021
Accepted: 16 August 2021
Published: 10 February 2022
Abstract Views: 2550
PDF: 258
HTML: 19
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Although coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) remains rampant in many countries, it has recently waned in Sichuan, China. This study examined spatiotemporal variations of the epidemiological characteristics of COVID-19 across its course. Three approaches, i.e. calendar-based, measure-driven and data-driven ones, were applied to all individual cases reported as of 30th November 2020, dividing the COVID-19 pandemic into five periods. A total of 808 people with confirmed diagnosis and 279 asymptomatic cases were reported, the majority of whom were aged 30-49 and <30 years, respectively. The highest risk was seen in Chengdu (capital city), with 411 confirmed and 195 asymptomatic cases. The main sources of infection changed from importation from Hubei Province to importation from other provinces, then local transmission and ultimately importation from foreign countries. The periods highlighted by the three methods presented different epidemic patterns and trends. The calendar-based periods were even with most cases aggregated in the first period, which did not reflect various transmission patterns of COVID-19 due to various sources of infection; the measure-driven and data-driven periods were not consistent with each other, revealing that the effects of implementing prevention measures were reflected on the epidemic trend with a time lag. For example, the decreasing trends of new cases occurred 7, 3 and 4 days later than the firstlevel emergency response, the district-level prevention measures and the second-level emergency response, respectively. This study has advanced our understanding of epidemic course and foreshown all stages of COVID-19 epidemic. Many countries can learn from our findings about what will occur next in their timelines and how to be better prepared.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Anselin L, 2010. Local Indicators of Spatial Association - LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93-115. DOI:
CDC, 2020. How COVID-19 Spreads. Available from: Accessed: 25 June 2020.
Jia P, 2020. Understanding the epidemic course in order to improve epidemic forecasting. Geohealth 4:e2020GH000303. DOI:
Jia P, Dong W, Yang S, Zhan Z, Tu L, Lai S, 2020. Spatial lifecourse epidemiology and infectious disease research. Trends Parasitol 36:234-8. DOI:
Jia P, Yang S, 2020a. Time to spatialise epidemiology in China. Lancet Global Health 8:e764-5. DOI:
Jia P, Yang S, 2020b. Are we ready for a new era of high-impact and high-frequency epidemics?. Nature 580:321. DOI:
Kulldorff M, Athas W, Feurer E, Miller B, Key C, 1998. Evaluating cluster alarms: a space-time scan statistic and brain cancer in Los Alamos, New Mexico. Am J Public Health 88:1377-80. DOI:
Li H, Li H, Ding Z, Hu Z, Chen F, Wang K, Peng Z, Shen H, 2020. Spatial statistical analysis of coronavirus disease 2019 (covid-19) in China. Geospat Health 15:867. DOI:
Li Y, Li M, Rice M, Zhang H, Sha D, Li M, Su Y, Yang C, 2021. The impact of policy measures on human mobility, COVID-19 cases, and mortality in the US: a spatiotemporal perspective. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:996. DOI:
Lipsitch M, Swerdlow DL, Finelli L, 2020. Defining the epidemiology of Covid-19 - studies needed. N Engl J Med 382:1194-6. DOI:
National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, 2020a. Covid-19 treatment plan (trial version 7). Available from: Accessed: 25 June 2020.
National Health Commission of the People’s Republic of China, 2020b. Covid-19 prevention and control plan (6th edition). Available from: Accessed: 25 June 2020.
Tao C, Monsuru A, Tobias P, 2014. Modifiable temporal unit problem (MTUP) and Its effect on space-time cluster detection. PLos One 9:e100465-. DOI:
Wang KW, Gao J, Wang H, Wu XL, Yuan QF, Guo FY, Zhang ZJ, Cheng Y, 2020. Epidemiology of 2019 novel coronavirus in Jiangsu Province, China after wartime control measures: A population-level retrospective study. Travel Med Infect Dis 35:101654. DOI:
WHO, 2020. Coronavirus disease (COVID-19) weekly epidemiological update - 1 December, 2020. Available from: Accessed: 5 December 2020.
Yang S, Dai S, Huang Y, Jia P, 2021. Pitfalls in modeling asymptomatic COVID-19 Infection. Front Public Health 9:593176. DOI:
Yang W, Deng M, Li C & Huang J, 2020. Spatio-temporal patterns of the 2019-nCoV epidemic at the county level in Hubei Province, China. Int J Environ Res Public Health 17:2563. DOI:
Yu X, Sun X, Cui P, Pan H, Lin S, Han R, Jiang C, Fang Q, Kong D, Zhu Y, Zheng Y, Gong X, Xiao W, Mao S, Jin B, Wu H, Fu C, 2020. Epidemiological and clinical characteristics of 333 confirmed cases with coronavirus disease 2019 in Shanghai, China. Transbound Emerg Dis 67:1697-707. DOI:

How to Cite

Huang, Y., Yang, S. ., Zou, Y. ., Su, J., Wu, C. ., Zhong, B., & Jia, P. (2022). Spatiotemporal epidemiology of COVID-19 from an epidemic course perspective. Geospatial Health, 17(s1).

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo

Similar Articles

1 2 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.