The spatiotemporal dynamics and structural covariates of homicide in the Republic of Korea, 2008-2017: A dynamic spatial panel data approach

Submitted: 21 July 2021
Accepted: 10 December 2021
Published: 9 May 2022
Abstract Views: 661
PDF: 356
HTML: 27
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


This study examined the relationship between the homicide rate and diverse indicators of social disorganization in the Republic of Korea (South Korea) using datasets collected between 2008 and 2017. Due to the statistical limitations of previous homicide research, which used either cross-sectional or longitudinal methodology, this study applied the dynamic spatial panel data model to explore both the spatial and temporal aspects of homicide. The results demonstrate that the homicide rate is spatially and temporally dependent on those of neighbouring units and the time-lagged homicide rate. Moreover, this study found that divorce rate, unemployment rate, number of males in the neighbourhood and ethnic heterogeneity have a statistically significant impact on the homicide phenomenon. This study contributes to the existing literature by taking a new approach - the dynamic spatial panel data model - to investigate the homicide phenomenon in Korea. In doing so, several suggestions are made for policymakers to respond to homicide rates. Based on the social disorganization theory, these indicators have been found to impact the social network and community members' willingness to engage in social control. This study suggests that customized policies should be implemented to alleviate the level of social disorganization and promote social control over lethal violence.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Akers RL, 2013. Criminological theories: introduction and evaluation. Chicago, IL, USA: Fitzroy Dearborn Publishers.
Baller RD, Shin DJ, Richardson KK, 2005. An extension and test of Sutherland’s concept of differential social disorganization: The geographic clustering of Japanese suicide and homicide rates. Suicide Life Threat Behav 35:343-55. DOI:
Baltagi BH, Blien U, Wolf K, 2012. A dynamic spatial panel data approach to the German wage curve. Econ Model 29:12-21. DOI:
Belotti F, Hughes G, Mortari AP, 2016. Spatial panel data models using Stata. Stata J 17:139-80. DOI:
Breuer C, 2015. Unemployment and suicide mortality: Evidence from regional panel data in Europe. Health Econ 24:936-50. DOI:
Bussu A, Detotto C, Sterzi V, 2013. Social conformity and suicide. J Soc Econ 42:67-78. DOI:
Cohen J, Tita G, 1999. Diffusion in homicide: Exploring a general method for detecting spatial diffusion process. J Quant Criminol 15:451-93. DOI:
Feldmeyer B, 2009. Immigration and violence: The offsetting effects of immigrant concentration on Latino violence. Soc Sci Res 38:717-31. DOI:
Graif C, Sampson RJ, 2009. Spatial heterogeneity in the effects of immigration and diversity on neighborhood homicide rates. Homicide Stud 13:242-60. DOI:
Joo Y, 2017. Spatiotemporal study of elderly suicide in Korea by age cohort. Public Health 142:144-51. DOI:
Kong D, Yoon K, Yu S, 2010. The social dimensions of immigration in Korea. J Contemp Asia 40:252-74. DOI:
Korea Citation Index, 2020. Article search. Available from:
KOSIS, 2020. Suicide Statistics. Available from:
Mancik AM, Parker KF, Williams KR, 2018, Neighborhood context and homicide clearance: Estimating the effects of collective efficacy. Homicide Stud 22:88-213. DOI:
McCall PL, Land KC, Parker KF, 2010. An empirical assessment of what we know about structural covariates of homicide rate: a return to a classic 20 years later. Homicide Stud 14:219-43. DOI:
Lizzi EAS, Garrido MVG, Xavier LDS, Moraes GP, 2021. Homicides of black people in Brazil: A study of different regions, using generalized additive regression models-with a geo-spatial component. Geospat Health 16:966-75. DOI:
Menezes T, Silveira-Neto R, Monteiro C, Ratton JL, 2013. Spatial correlation between homicide rates and inequality: Evidence from urban neighborhoods. Econ Lett 120:97-9. DOI:
Nivette AE, 2011. Cross-national predictors of crime: A meta-analysis. Homicide Stud 15:103-31. DOI:
Ousey GC, Kubrin CE, 2014. Immigration and the changing nature of homicide in US cities, 1980-2010. J Quant Criminol 30:453-83. DOI:
Pereira DVS, Mota CMM, Andresen MA, 2015. Social disorganization and homicide in Recife, Brazil. Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol 61:1570-92. DOI:
Phillips JA, 2006. Explaining discrepant findings in cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses: An application to U.S. homicide rates. Soc Sci Res 35:948-74. DOI:
Porter JR, Purser CW, 2010. Social disorganization, marriage, and reported crime: A spatial econometrics examination of family formation and criminal offending. J Crim Justice 38:942-50. DOI:
Pridemore WA, 2002. What we know about social structure and homicide: A review of the theoretical and empirical literature. Violence Vict 17:127-56. DOI:
Ruther M, 2013. The effect of growth in foreign born population share on county homicide rates: A spatial panel approach. Violence Vict 93:1-23. DOI:
Sampson RJ, 2013. The place of context: A theory and strategy for criminology’s hard problems. Criminol 51:1-31. DOI:
Sampson RJ, 2011. Great American city: Chicago and the enduring neighborhood effect. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press. DOI:
Sampson RJ, Groves WB, 1989. Community structure and crime: Testing social-disorganization theory. Am J Sociol 94:774-802. DOI:
Sampson RJ, Raudenbush SW, Earls F, 1997. Neighborhoods and violent crime: A multilevel study of collective efficacy. Science 277:918-24. DOI:
World Bank, 2019. Republic of Korea Data. Available from:
Wang F, Arnold MT, 2008. Localized income inequality, concentrated disadvantage and homicide. Appl Geogr 28:259-70. DOI:
Ye X, Wu L, 2011. Analyzing the dynamics of homicide patterns in Chicago: ESDA and spatial panel approaches. Appl Geogr 31:800-7. DOI:
Yeom Y, 2021. Analyzing the spatial and temporal dynamics of suicide in South Korea: An application of dynamic spatial panel data model. Geospat Health 16:964-71. DOI:

How to Cite

Yeom, Y., & Choi, J. (2022). The spatiotemporal dynamics and structural covariates of homicide in the Republic of Korea, 2008-2017: A dynamic spatial panel data approach. Geospatial Health, 17(1).