Comparison of GPS imputation methods in environmental health research

Submitted: 15 February 2022
Accepted: 4 July 2022
Published: 29 August 2022
Abstract Views: 1767
PDF: 683
HTML: 27
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Assessment of personal exposure in the external environment commonly relies on global positioning system (GPS) measurements. However, it has been challenging to determine exposures accurately due to missing data in GPS trajectories. In environmental health research using GPS, missing data are often discarded or are typically imputed based on the last known location or linear interpolation. Imputation is said to mitigate bias in exposure measures, but methods used are hardly evaluated against ground truth. Widely used imputation methods assume that a person is either stationary or constantly moving during the missing interval. Relaxing this assumption, we propose a method for imputing locations as a function of a person’s likely movement state (stop, move) during the missing interval. We then evaluate the proposed method in terms of the accuracy of imputed location, movement state, and daily mobility measures such as the number of trips and time spent on places visited. Experiments based on real data collected by participants (n=59) show that the proposed approach outperforms existing methods. Imputation to the last known location can lead to large deviation from the actual location when gap distance is large. Linear interpolation is shown to result in large errors in mobility measures. Researchers should be aware that the different treatment of missing data can affect the spatiotemporal accuracy of GPS-based exposure assessments.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Allahbakhshi H, Conrow L, Naimi B, Weibel R, 2020. Using accelerometer and GPS data for real-life physical activity type detection. Sensors 20:588. DOI:
Almanza E, Jerrett M, Dunton G, Seto E, Pentz MA, 2012. A study of community design, greenness, and physical activity in children using satellite, GPS and accelerometer data. Health Place 18:46-54. DOI:
Barnett I, Onnela J-P, 2018. Inferring mobility measures from GPS traces with missing data. Biostat Oxf Engl 21:e98-e112. DOI:
Carlson JA, Jankowska MM, Meseck K, Godbole S, Natarajan L, Raab F, Demchak B, Patrick K, Kerr J, 2015. Validity of PALMS GPS scoring of active and passive travel compared to SenseCam. Med Sci Sports Exerc 47:662-7. DOI:
Chaix B, Benmarhnia T, Kestens Y, Brondeel R, Perchoux C, Gerber P, Duncan DT, 2019. Combining sensor tracking with a GPS-based mobility survey to better measure physical activity in trips: public transport generates walking. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 16:84. DOI:
Chaix B, Kestens Y, Perchoux C, Karusisi N, Merlo J, Labadi K, 2012. An interactive mapping tool to assess individual mobility patterns in neighborhood studies. Am J Prev Med 43:440-50. DOI:
Chaix B, Méline J, Duncan S, Merrien C, Karusisi N, Perchoux C, Lewin A, Labadi K, Kestens Y, 2013. GPS tracking in neighborhood and health studies: a step forward for environmental exposure assessment, a step backward for causal inference? Health Place 21:46-51. DOI:
Christensen A, Griffiths C, Hobbs M, Gorse C, Radley D, 2021. Accuracy of buffers and self-drawn neighbourhoods in representing adolescent GPS measured activity spaces: an exploratory study. Health Place 69:102569. DOI:
Evans CC, Hanke TA, Zielke D, Keller S, Ruroede K, 2012. Monitoring community mobility with global positioning system technology after a stroke: a case study. J Neurol Phys Ther 36. DOI:
Fillekes MP, Kim E-K, Trumpf R, Zijlstra W, Giannouli E, Weibel R, 2019. Assessing older adults’ daily mobility: a comparison of GPS-derived and self-reported mobility indicators. Sensors 19:4551. DOI:
Hanke TA, Hwang S, Keller S, Zielke D, Hailey T, Nathaniel K, Evans CC, 2019. Measuring community mobility in survivors of stroke using global positioning system technology: a prospective observational study. J Neurol Phys Ther 43:175-85. DOI:
Hirsch JA, Winters M, Clarke P, McKay H, 2014. Generating GPS activity spaces that shed light upon the mobility habits of older adults: a descriptive analysis. Int J Health Geogr 13:51. DOI:
Hordacre B, Barr C, Crotty M, 2014. Use of an activity monitor and GPS device to assess community activity and participation in transtibial amputees. Sensors 14:5845-59. DOI:
Hornsby K, Egenhofer MJ, 2002. Modeling moving objects over multiple granularities. Ann Math Artif Intell 36:177-94. DOI:
Hwang S, VanDeMark C, Dhatt N, Yalla SV, Crews RT, 2018. Segmenting human trajectory data by movement states while addressing signal loss and signal noise. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 32:1391-412. DOI:
James P, Hart JE, Hipp JA, Mitchell JA, Kerr J, Hurvitz PM, Glanz K, Laden F, 2017. GPS-based exposure to greenness and walkability and accelerometry-based physical activity. Cancer Epidemiol Biomark Prev Publ Am Assoc Cancer Res Cosponsored Am Soc Prev Oncol 26:525-32. DOI:
Jankowska MM, Schipperijn J, Kerr J, 2015. A framework for using GPS data in physical activity and sedentary behavior studies. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 43:48-56. DOI:
Jansen M, Kamphuis CBM, Pierik FH, Ettema DF, Dijst MJ, 2018. Neighborhood-based PA and its environmental correlates: a GIS- and GPS based cross-sectional study in the Netherlands. BMC Public Health 18:233. DOI:
Jayaraman A, Deeny S, Eisenberg Y, Mathur G, Kuiken T, 2014. Global position sensing and step activity as outcome measures of community mobility and social interaction for an individual with a transfemoral amputation due to dysvascular disease. Phys Ther 94:401-10. DOI:
Jones AP, Coombes EG, Griffin SJ, Sluijs EM van, 2009. Environmental supportiveness for physical activity in English schoolchildren: a study using global positioning systems. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 6:42. DOI:
Kerr J, Duncan S, Schipperjin J, 2011. Using global positioning systems in health research: a practical approach to data collection and processing. Am J Prev Med 41:532-40. DOI:
Kerr J, Marshall S, Godbole S, Neukam S, Crist K, Wasilenko K, Golshan S, Buchner D, 2012. The relationship between outdoor activity and health in older adults using GPS. Int J Environ Res Public Health 9:4615-25. DOI:
Klinker CD, Schipperijn J, Christian H, Kerr J, Ersbøll AK, Troelsen J, 2014. Using accelerometers and global positioning system devices to assess gender and age differences in children’s school, transport, leisure and home based physical activity. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11:8. DOI:
Krenn PJ, Titze S, Oja P, Jones A, Ogilvie D, 2011. Use of global positioning systems to study physical activity and the environment: a systematic review. Am J Prev Med 41:508-15. DOI:
Lee K, Kwan M-P, 2018. Physical activity classification in free-living conditions using smartphone accelerometer data and exploration of predicted results. Comput Environ Urban Syst 67:124-31. DOI:
Loh M, Sarigiannis D, Gotti A, Karakitsios S, Pronk A, Kuijpers E, Annesi-Maesano I, Baiz N, Madureira J, Oliveira Fernandes E, Jerrett M, Cherrie JW, 2017. How sensors might help define the external exposome. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:434. DOI:
Maddison R, Jiang Y, Vander Hoorn S, Exeter D, Mhurchu CN, Dorey E, 2010. Describing patterns of physical activity in adolescents using global positioning systems and accelerometry. Pediatr Exerc Sci 22:392-407. DOI:
McCrorie PR, Fenton C, Ellaway A, 2014. Combining GPS, GIS, and accelerometry to explore the physical activity and environment relationship in children and young people - a review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 11:93. DOI:
McGrath LJ, Hopkins WG, Hinckson EA, 2015. Associations of objectively measured built-environment attributes with youth moderate-vigorous physical activity: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sports Med 45:841-65. DOI:
Mennis J, Mason M, Coffman DL, Henry K, 2018. Geographic imputation of missing activity space data from ecological momentary assessment (EMA) GPS positions. Int J Environ Res Public Health 15:2740. DOI:
Meseck K, Jankowska MM, Schipperijn J, Natarajan L, Godbole S, Carlson J, Takemoto M, Crist K, Kerr J, 2016. Is missing geographic positioning system data in accelerometry studies a problem, and is imputation the solution? Geospat Health 11:403. DOI:
Miller HJ, 1991. Modelling accessibility using space-time prism concepts within geographical information systems. Int J Geogr Inf Syst 5:287-301. DOI:
Oliver M, Badland H, Mavoa S, Duncan MJ, Duncan S, 2010. Combining GPS, GIS, and accelerometry: methodological issues in the assessment of location and intensity of travel behaviors. J Phys Act Health 7:102-8. DOI:
Oreskovic NM, Perrin JM, Robinson AI, Locascio JJ, Blossom J, Chen ML, Winickoff JP, Field AE, Green C, Goodman E, 2015. Adolescents’ use of the built environment for physical activity. BMC Public Health 15:251. DOI:
Pfoser D, Jensen CS, 1999. Capturing the uncertainty of moving-object representations. In: Güting RH, Papadias D, Lochovsky F (Eds.), Advances in spatial databases, lecture notes in computer science. Springer, Berlin-Heidelberg, pp. 111-131. DOI:
Quigg R, Gray A, Reeder AI, Holt A, Waters DL, 2010. Using accelerometers and GPS units to identify the proportion of daily physical activity located in parks with playgrounds in New Zealand children. Prev Med 50:235-40. DOI:
Rainham DG, Bates CJ, Blanchard CM, Dummer TJ, Kirk SF, Shearer CL, 2012. Spatial classification of youth physical activity patterns. Am J Prev Med 42:e87-96. DOI:
Remmers T, Thijs C, Ettema D, de Vries S, Slingerland M, Kremers S, 2019. Critical hours and important environments: relationships between afterschool physical activity and the physical environment using GPS, GIS and accelerometers in 10-12-year-old children. Int J Environ Res Public Health 16:3116. DOI:
Rodriguez DA, Brown AL, Troped PJ, 2005. Portable global positioning units to complement accelerometery-based physical activity monitors. Med Sci Sports Exerc 37:S572-81. DOI:
Rundle AG, Sheehan DM, Quinn JW, Bartley K, Eisenhower D, Bader MMD, Lovasi GS, Neckerman KM, 2016. Using GPS data to study neighborhood walkability and physical activity. Am J Prev Med 50:e65-72. DOI:
Sambasivan N, Kapania S, Highfill H, Akrong D, Paritosh PK, Aroyo LM, 2021. Everyone wants to do the model work, not the data work: data cascades in high-stakes AI. In: Proceedings of the 2021 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 1-15. DOI:
Tamura K, Wilson JS, Goldfeld K, Puett RC, Klenosky DB, Harper WA, Troped PJ, 2019. Accelerometer and GPS data to analyze built environments and physical activity. Res Q Exerc Sport 90:395-402. DOI:
Van Hecke L, Verhoeven H, Clarys P, Van Dyck D, Van de Weghe N, Baert T, Deforche B, Van Cauwenberg J, 2018. Factors related with public open space use among adolescents: a study using GPS and accelerometers. Int J Health Geogr 17:3. DOI:
Wei L-Y, Zheng Y, Peng,W-C, 2012. Constructing popular routes from uncertain trajectories. In: Proceedings of the 18th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, KDD ‘12. ACM, New York, NY, USA, pp. 195-203. DOI:
Wheeler BW, Cooper AR, Page AS, Jago R, 2010. Greenspace and children’s physical activity: a GPS/GIS analysis of the PEACH project. Prev Med 51:148-152. DOI:
Wiehe SE, Hoch SC, Liu GC, Carroll AE, Wilson JS, Fortenberry JD, 2008. Adolescent travel patterns: pilot data indicating distance from home varies by time of day and day of week. J. Adolesc Health 42:418-20. DOI:
Yoo E-H, Roberts JE, Eum Y, Shi Y, 2020. Quality of hybrid location data drawn from GPS-enabled mobile phones: Does it matter? Trans GIS 24:462-82. DOI:
Zhao P, Jonietz D, Raubal M, 2021. Applying frequent-pattern mining and time geography to impute gaps in smartphone-based human-movement data. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 0:1-29.

How to Cite

Hwang, S., Webber-Ritchey, K., & Moxley, E. (2022). Comparison of GPS imputation methods in environmental health research. Geospatial Health, 17(2).

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo