Spatial access to public hospitals during COVID-19 in Nottinghamshire, UK

Submitted: 20 June 2022
Accepted: 23 October 2022
Published: 29 November 2022
Abstract Views: 586
PDF: 499
HTML: 30
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


We intend to tackle two under-addressed issues in access to healthcare services during the COVID-19 pandemic: first, the spatiotemporal dynamic of access during the pandemic of acute communicable disease; second, the demographic and socioeconomic access disparities. We used the two-step floating catchment area (2SFCA) method to measure the spatial access to public hospitals during the second COVID-19 wave (September 28th-February 28th, 2021) in Nottinghamshire, UK. To investigate the temporal variation in access along with the development of the pandemic, we divided our study period into 11 sections and applied the 2SFCA to each of them. The results indicate that western Nottinghamshire is better than the eastern part from a spatial perspective and the north-western urban area represents the highest spatial access; temporally, the accessibility of the public hospitals generally decreased when the number of cases increased. Particular low accessibility was observed at the beginning of the pandemic when the outbreak hit the university region and its vicinities during the back-to-school season. Our disparity analysis found that i) the access of the senior population to public hospitals deviated from that of the general population, ii) the access was positively associated with socioeconomic status, and iii) all disparities were related to the urban-rural discrepancy. These findings can help to plan temporary clinics or hospitals during epidemic emergencies. More generally, they provide scientific support to pandemic-related healthcare resource allocation and policy- making, particularly for people in vulnerable areas.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


British Foreign Policy Group (BFPG), 2021. COVID-19 Timeline. Available at:
Delamater PL, 2013. Spatial accessibility in suboptimally configured health care systems: a modified two-step floating catchment area (M2SFCA) metric. Health Place 24:30-43. DOI:
Donohoe J, Marshall V, Tan X, Camacho FT, Anderson R, Balkrishnan R, 2016. Evaluating and comparing methods for measuring spatial access to mammography centers in Appalachia. Health Serv Outcomes Res Methodol 16:22-40. DOI:
Doyle Y, Bull A, 2000. Role of private sector in United Kingdom healthcare system. Br Med J 321:563-5. DOI:
Ghorbanzadeh M, Kim K, Erman Ozguven E, Horner MW, 2021. Spatial accessibility assessment of COVID-19 patients to healthcare facilities: A case study of Florida. Travel Behav Soc 24:95-101. DOI:
Heath S, 2021. What is the social vulnerability index, how does it measure SDOH? Patient engagement hit. Available at:
House of Commons Library, 2021. Coronavirus: Economic impact. Available at:
Iyengar KP, Ish P, Botchu R, Jain VK, Vaishya R, 2021. Influence of the Peltzman effect on the recurrent COVID-19 waves in Europe. Postgrad Med J 98:e110-e111. DOI:
Kang JY, Michels A, Lyu F, Wang S, Agbodo N, Freeman VL, Wang S, 2020. Rapidly measuring spatial accessibility of COVID-19 healthcare resources: a case study of Illinois, USA. Int J Health Geogr 19:36. DOI:
Kiani B, Bagheri N, Tara A, Hoseini B, Hashtarkhani S, Tara M, 2018. Comparing potential spatial access with self-reported travel times and cost analysis to haemodialysis facilities in North-eastern Iran. Geospat Health 13:703. DOI:
Lopez PJ, Neely AH, 2021. Fundamentally uncaring: The differential multi-scalar impacts of COVID-19 in the US. Soc Sci Med 272:113707. DOI:
Luo W, Qi Y, 2009. An enhanced two-step floating catchment area (E2SFCA) method for measuring spatial accessibility to primary care physicians. Health Place 15:1100-7. DOI:
Luo W, Wang F, 2003. Measures of spatial accessibility to healthcare in a GIS environment: synthesis and a case study in Chicago region. Environ Plann B Plann Des 30:865-884. DOI:
Mbunge E, Akinnuwesi B, Fashoto SG, Metfula AS,Mashwama P, 2021. A critical review of emerging technologies for tackling COVID-19 pandemic. Hum Behav Emerg 3:25-39. DOI:
Mohammadi A, Mollalo A, Bergquist R, Kiani B, 2021. Measuring COVID-19 vaccination coverage: an enhanced age-adjusted two-step floating catchment area model. Infect Dis Poverty 10-118. DOI:
Mollalo A, Mohammadi A, Mavaddati S, Kiani B, 2021. Spatial analysis of COVID-19 vaccination: a scoping REVIEW. Int J Environ Res Public Health 18:12024. DOI:
National Health Service, 2022. Primary Care. Available at:
Nottinghamshire Council website, No Date. What do we do [Online]. Available at:
Nottinghamshire County Council, 2021. Context: Nottinghamshire in 2021. Available at:
Payne R, Abel G, 2012. UK indices of multiple deprivation - A way to make comparisons across constituent countries easier. Health Stat Q 53.
Raeesi A, Kiani B, Hesami A, Goshayeshi L, Firouraghi N, Mohammad Ebrahimi S, Hashtarkhani S, 2022. Access to the COVID-19 services during the pandemic - a scoping review. Geospat Health 17:1079. DOI:
Shi X, Alford-Teaster J, Onega T, Wang D, 2012. Spatial access and local demand for major cancer care facilities in the United States. Assoc Geogr 102:1125-1134. DOI:
Tao R, Downs J, Beckie TM, Chen Y, Mcnelley W, 2020. Examining spatial accessibility to COVID-19 testing sites in Florida. Annals of GIS 26:319-327. DOI:
The Medical Portal, 2021. Structure of the NHS. Available at:
The King’s Fund, 2014. The UK private health market. Available at:
UK government website, 2022. Coronavirus (COVID-19) in the UK. Available at:
Wan N, Zou B, Sternberg T, 2012. A three-step floating catchment area method for analysing spatial access to health services. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 26:1073-1089. DOI:
Wang F, Luo W, 2005. Assessing spatial and nonspatial factors for healthcare access: towards an integrated approach to defining health professional shortage areas. Health Place 11:131-46. DOI:
Wang F, 2017. Inverted two-step floating catchment area method for measuring facility crowdedness. Prof Geogr 70:251-260. DOI:
Wang F, 2021. From 2SFCA to i2SFCA: integration, derivation and validation. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 35:628-638. DOI:
Watson V, Dibben C, Cox M, Atherton I, Sutton M, Ryan M, 2019. Testing the expert based weights used in the UK’s index of multiple deprivation (IMD) against three preference-based methods. Soc Indic Res 144:1055-1074. DOI:
World Health Organisation (WHO), 2022. WHO Coronavirus (COVID-19) Dashboard. Available at:
Yao J, Murray AT, Agadjanian V, 2013. A geographical perspective on access to sexual and reproductive health care for women in rural Africa. Soc Sci Med 96:60-8. DOI:
Zhang J, Wang M, Zhao M, Guo S, Xu Y, Ye J, Ding W, Wang Z, Ye D, Pan W, Liu M, Li D, Luo Z, Liu J, Wan J, 2020. The clinical characteristics and prognosis factors of mild-moderate patients with COVID-19 in a mobile cabin hospital: A retrospective, single-center study. Front Public Health, 8:264. DOI:

How to Cite

Zhang, J., & Li, M. (2022). Spatial access to public hospitals during COVID-19 in Nottinghamshire, UK. Geospatial Health, 17(2).