Quantifying altitude of human habitation in studies of human health using geographical name server data

Submitted: 8 February 2016
Accepted: 10 August 2016
Published: 21 November 2016
Abstract Views: 1223
PDF: 666
HTML: 780
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.


Almost all studies examining the effects of altitude on human health have estimated the geographical altitude of defined regions, yet the primary interest lies in where people live, not the land around them. Populations are not homogenously distributed across altitudes. We propose a straightforward and computationally simple method for estimating the average altitude of habitation within the regional units for which health statistics are typically reported (such as counties). The United States Board on Geographical Names database contains records for over 2.7 million places, which can be processed to select places that are associated with human habitation. These points can easily be averaged by region yielding a representative altitude of human habitation within city, county, state regions, or by longitude and latitude zones. We provide an example of using this approach in a study of human health, and compare it with three other previously used methods of estimating altitude for counties.



PlumX Metrics


Download data is not yet available.


Supporting Agencies

United States Department of Veterans Affairs
Stephen Thielke, Puget Sound VA Medical Center, Geriatric Research, Education, and Clinical Centers, Seattle, WA

Associate Professor

Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences

How to Cite

Thielke, S., Slatore, C. G., & Banks, W. A. (2016). Quantifying altitude of human habitation in studies of human health using geographical name server data. Geospatial Health, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2016.463