Searching for space-time clusters: The CutL method compared to Kulldorff's scan statistic

Submitted: 6 June 2019
Accepted: 10 October 2019
Published: 6 November 2019
Abstract Views: 1110
PDF: 568
HTML: 112
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.

Authors

Both epidemiology and health care planning require analytical tools, especially for cluster detection in cases with unusually high rates of disease incidence. The aim of this work was to extend the application of the CutL method, which is used for detecting spatial clusters of any shape, to detecting space-time clusters, and to show how the method works compared to Kulldorff's scan statistic. In the CutL method, clusters with disease incidence rates higher than the one entered by the researcher are searched for. The way in which the space-time version of that method works is illustrated with the example of data simulating the distribution of people affected by health problems in Polish counties in the period 2013- 2017. With respect to detection of irregularly shaped space-time clusters, the CutL method turned out to be more effective than Kulldorff's scan statistic; for cylinder-shaped space-time clusters, the two methods produced similar results. The CutL method has also the important advantage of being widely accessible through the PQScut and PQStat programmes (PQStat Software Company, Poznan, Poland).

Dimensions

Altmetric

PlumX Metrics

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Citations

Supporting Agencies

Statutory research of Department of Computer Science and Statistics, PUMS, 2715

How to Cite

WiÄ™ckowska, B., Gòrna, I., Trojanowski, M., Pruciak, A., & StawiÅ„ska-WitoszyÅ„ska, B. (2019). Searching for space-time clusters: The CutL method compared to Kulldorff’s scan statistic. Geospatial Health, 14(2). https://doi.org/10.4081/gh.2019.791

List of Cited By :

Crossref logo